Just a reminder -
The 85th Annual Academy Award
OSCARS VIEWING PARTY
February 24, 2013 Doors @ 6pm
Join us Sunday, February 24th for the 85th Annual Academy Awards, presented live on Big Screen Plaza’s 30 ft. HD screen. Drink specials include $3 select beers and $6 themed cocktails. Make your Oscar picks and predictions in our Oscar Pool, and the winner will receive a bottle of champagne for their table. The celebration kicks off at 6pm with live Red Carpet coverage.
Big Screen Plaza | The Event Hotel
839 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10001
646.600.7141 | rsvp@bigscreenplaza.com
Send reservations to rsvp@bigscreenplaza.com to receive your official Oscar Ballot, which must be submitted via email or in person before the show begins to qualify. Spread your Oscar buzz with @BigScreenNY using #EventiOscars.
See you in your Red Carpet finest!
Blog for current students at the Art Institute of New York City in Digital Filmmaking.
Showing posts with label oscars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oscars. Show all posts
Friday, February 22, 2013
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
The Simpsons Short - The Longest Daycare
Check out The Simpsons' Oscar-nominated Animated Short, Maggie Simpson in "The Longest Daycare":
http://www.metatube.com/es/videos/171544/Maggie-Simpson-The-Longest-Daycare/embed/
http://www.metatube.com/es/videos/171544/Maggie-Simpson-The-Longest-Daycare/embed/
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Oscars: Does the Academy represent the best?
So, this year I neglected to cover the Oscars in my typical fashion for several reasons. Most of which being that I am unusually overwhelmed (as you can tell with my door being closed, often:) And because most of the films and performances that I have been following for 2011 were not recognized with nominations. Being a spoiled sport does not fit within my personality, but I will admit that I felt curious as to why some of the best work out there was being ignored by the Academy.
The critical community keeps tabs on accolades by tracking awards given at film festivals; most importantly Cannes, Venice, and Sundance. Awards given at these festivals did not reflect in the nominations nor the winners on Sunday night's event. Even industry sub committee (VES for Visual Effects; SAG for Actors) awards did not accurately reflect the films that won. This got me thinking, "Who makes these decisions? Why were these people given the authority to decide the absolute best in filmmaking?"
The LA Times answered this for me. They have a great series of articles and videos exploring Academy voting statistics. Please click on the links below to learn more about the Academy and the voting process -
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/academy/
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/academy/la-et-unmasking-oscar-academy-project-html,0,7473284.htmlstory
In my opinion, I think the process to be an academy voter is antiquated at best. The pillars of our industry are not even voting members, as revealed in this report. So why do we give the Academy Awards such notoriety when their membership does not accurately reflect excellence in the industry or the critical community? I'm asking this as a person who regards the Oscars ceremony as the "Super Bowl of Film Nerds." My video attendance for the yearly spectacle has been consistent since 1990. I love the race, speculation, anticipation, and yes, the outfits. But, this year, I felt that the nominations did not reflect perfection in filmmaking, overall.
I'll end this post with a video from JoBlo that highlights the films that should have been nominated this year. Let me know what you think. Cheers, Eve.
The critical community keeps tabs on accolades by tracking awards given at film festivals; most importantly Cannes, Venice, and Sundance. Awards given at these festivals did not reflect in the nominations nor the winners on Sunday night's event. Even industry sub committee (VES for Visual Effects; SAG for Actors) awards did not accurately reflect the films that won. This got me thinking, "Who makes these decisions? Why were these people given the authority to decide the absolute best in filmmaking?"
The LA Times answered this for me. They have a great series of articles and videos exploring Academy voting statistics. Please click on the links below to learn more about the Academy and the voting process -
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/academy/
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/academy/la-et-unmasking-oscar-academy-project-html,0,7473284.htmlstory
In my opinion, I think the process to be an academy voter is antiquated at best. The pillars of our industry are not even voting members, as revealed in this report. So why do we give the Academy Awards such notoriety when their membership does not accurately reflect excellence in the industry or the critical community? I'm asking this as a person who regards the Oscars ceremony as the "Super Bowl of Film Nerds." My video attendance for the yearly spectacle has been consistent since 1990. I love the race, speculation, anticipation, and yes, the outfits. But, this year, I felt that the nominations did not reflect perfection in filmmaking, overall.
I'll end this post with a video from JoBlo that highlights the films that should have been nominated this year. Let me know what you think. Cheers, Eve.
Friday, February 10, 2012
2012 Oscar Nominated Shorts
Labels:
oscars,
screening,
short films
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


